The mainstream scientific community holds that modern humans have existed for about 190,000 years. However, a mathematical model presents a compelling argument for a much shorter timeline: only around 4,000 years. This article will explore this mathematical approach and examine how it challenges conventional views of human history.
The model in question takes a simple yet profound approach, focusing on population growth over time. By applying different annual growth rates to various starting populations, the model reaches strikingly different conclusions about the length of human existence.
This mathematical perspective raises serious questions about the accepted human timeline. By offering a model that aligns more closely with the present-day population, it challenges the long-held 190,000-year figure. Some points to consider include:
The mathematical model presented here offers a provocative perspective on human history, suggesting a timeline of only 4,000 years rather than the commonly accepted 190,000 years. While the simplicity of the model is appealing, it also invites scrutiny and calls for deeper examination of the assumptions and variables involved. The dialogue between this mathematical approach and conventional archaeological, anthropological, and genetic evidence may lead to new insights and a richer understanding of our species' past.
0.5%